Week 5 - The Victorian Internet

As I read Standage's The Victorian Internet, I was amazed at how much the ascendance of the telegraph in the 19th century mirrors the rise of the Internet in the 20th. Like many innovations, telegraph technology was utilized for something other than its intended purpose. And, as with many innovations, it was misunderstood by many. Sending messages to distant locales over wires must have seemed like magic to those with little scientific expertise. The long line of inventors and scientists who contributed to its development had a hard time convincing the government, the military, and the general populace to adopt it for widespread use, but when it caught on it spread like wildfire, and became as ubiquitous as mobile phones are today. In the heyday of the telegraph it was used to order military maneuvers, to conduct business, to send money, to order clothing, to maintain relationships and to solemnify marriages. It created a new careers and a new subculture with its own rituals, in-class and its own vocabulary. Its early adopters and developers hailed it as the holy grail of its age, an invention that would connect distant cities, countries and even continents, and lead to world peace as all of humanity joined its wires together in a network of global communication.

As with many inventions of innovations that catch on, the telegraph was immediately set upon by the government in an attempt to regulate its use. It spawned codes and special language as people tried to bend telegraph messages to their purposes As with all technology, people soon found ways to put it to nefarious purposes. Cheats and scammers attempted to get ahead by using the telegraph to commit fraud. It wasn't all bad, though. Some of what the telegraph's far-seeing creators forecast did come true. Widespread use of the telegraph did connect distant communities and governments, and made the world a whole lot smaller. It enabled anyone with a message and a dollar to cast their words and intentions out into the world. The Internet does and is so many of these same things.

I didn't know much about the telegraph before I read Standage's book. I didn't realize that the popularization of this technology is so much like the rise of the Internet. I found the last few chapters of the book particularly prophetic. Standage seems to indicate that, inevitably, some new technology will come along that will improve upon what we once thought of as cutting edge. It's already happened. A long line of further developments and improvements have already made Internet protocols of the 80s and 90s seem old fashioned. The telegraph rose to social height until it was rendered obsolete by new technologies like the telephone. It's not hard to imagine that the Internet could follow that same pattern, that although we couldn't imagine anything more useful today, something will come along that will make it a thing of the past.

A lot of young people I know, teachers and others, like to be early adopters. They stand in line for the newest iPhone model the minute it's available. They feel, like Morse and others did in the 19th century, that the next new technology will improve their lives immeasurably, and be a panacea for all our modern problems. The problem with this view is that it neglects to take into account the human element. The invention of the telegraph may have shaped the landscape and the way we communicate, but it didn't change human nature. People who sent telegrams may have used a different communication mode than they had in the past, but what they were communicating stayed the same. There will always be gossip, business, romance, greed, news, narcissism. Whether these emotions, urges and ideas are transmitted over a wire or posted on Instagram, the basic human needs they serve are universal.

I think this has a lot of important implications for educators. The telegraph solved a basic human problem - the need to transmit messages more quickly and a wider distance. It's important to remember that technology is always changing at a blistering pace, but human needs and urges change very little. If we approach new technologies with a critical eye, and realize that none is a cure-all, but rather the latest chain in an endless line of human innovations, we can begin to educate students to solve the very oldest problems in new and innovative ways. Then perhaps one of our students will have the skills and expertise to conjure up the latest life and world changing "magic".

Comments

  1. Hi Zack! Once again, you've published a very well written blog post. As a former History teacher, I felt I knew a great deal about the invention of the telegraph, but I had never compared and contrasted it with the internet. I also appreciated all of the parallels and the ways in which human nature never changes. This makes me think of people in my age group (40s) and older who talk about the "good old days" and think that technology has ruined our society in many ways. Of course, there are some truths to that... people are more isolated than ever before, but if we look back at history. we can see that the same patterns and tendencies have been around in relation to technology for hundreds of years. Human beings will always crave connection and communication.... back then it was the telegraph and later the telephone. Today we have the internet, smart phones and social media. This is one of the things that I love about history so much. We study history to better understand ourselves. Thanks for a thoughtful and insightful post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Zack! I like that you talk about the "human element." I feel like sometimes humans create new technology just for the sake of having new technology, without really thinking through how it can be best used - that's something that comes later. I'm curious what's going to come next. Our need to send and transmit messages has been met; I'm not sure how much faster we would be able to communicate with one another, but I'm sure someone out there is trying to find a way! And then we will find a way to regulate and profit from it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stacey, I wonder about this, too. This book made me realize that the people living in the age of the telegraph probably thought they had reached the pinnacle of technology, too. I think that we will continue to see further developments in global communication. I can think of a few ways we could improve our technology, particularly in the areas of communication and finance. In the United States, electronic payment doesn't happen in real time. When you make an electronic deposit or a payment from a checking account, the payment still takes a few days to "post" to your account. It's not reflected in your balance instantly. That's something that other countries have mastered that we haven't yet in the US. Telecommunications technology could improve so that bad reception and dropped calls were a thing of the past. We could expand global networks so that there were no dead zones for cell phones. We could use satellites to easily give everyone on the planet free access to the Internet. I read a great article in CNET magazine recently. It features an interview with Joseph Gordon Levitt, a self-professed techie. Toward the end of the interview, he is asked what piece of tech he'd like to see that's not invented yet. He makes a good point, saying that video chat technology isn't yet nearly where it could be. The interview is here:

      https://www.cnet.com/special-reports/joseph-gordon-levitt-the-privacy-debate-is-on/

      Delete
    2. Zack, your insights into further development and improvement of technology are just another example of how informed that you are in this area. Like the people living in the age of the telegraph probably viewed this invention as magical, I too am also often completely amazed seeing how far tchnology has come in my lifetime.

      Delete
  3. Yes, the human element. Makes me think of Margot in Ray Bradbury's poem 'All Summer in a Day.' How this underground society, advanced enough to live successfully on Venus, yet the school-children were still as cruel as ever. No matter how advanced their technology was there is always the human wants & needs. Your blog has made me think of how we should view technology not as a 'savior' in and unto itself, but as a tool to solve our very human problems. Nicely said Zach.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jim! It's like Shakespeare said: “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars / But in ourselves..."

      Delete
  4. Once again you have written a very thorough, well-written blog. Two points that you brought up resonated with me. The first being that I can certainly relate to your comment regarding people wanting to be early adopters. They grasp onto newest, coolest technology (often a gimmick) without really knowing if it will or how it can improve their life. It's new and "better than sliced bread," so they have to have it. This is currently occurring with a few teachers in grades 3-5 raising money and buying class sets of the Ozobot after attending an NOVA STEM workshop this summer. I was skeptical to begin with, but am specially so since doing our affordance analysis on this gimmick last week! How do I break the news to them? or Do I?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Opps, forgot to include my second point that resonated with me. It is your comment of how technology is always changing at a blistering pace. I just watched 60 minutes two weeks ago about the development of artificial intelligence. What was one "thought of as the realm of science fiction has now become very much a reality. But it now has abilities we never expected. It can learn through experience -- much the way humans do -- and it won’t be long before machines, like their human creators, begin thinking for themselves, creatively. Independently with judgment -- sometimes better judgment than humans have." Specifically, they discussed IBM's creation of Watson, "one of the most sophisticated computing systems ever built." Five years ago, Watson was an avid reader with the capability of reading 1.000,000 books per second. I was fascinated and glued to the television as they continued to interview John Kelly and then moved on to Ned Sharpless. "Now, it’s gone through medical school. IBM has enlisted 20 top-cancer institutes to tutor Watson in genomics and oncology. One of the places Watson is currently doing its residency is at the university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Ned Sharpless runs the cancer center here." This technology breakthrough and how it can serve the medical field is indescribable to me. I was just left amazed.
      It was worth watching, so here's the link.
      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-artificial-intelligence-charlie-rose-robot-sophia/

      Delete
    2. Wow, thanks for all the great comments, everyone! I've really enjoyed reading all of them. Kim, I understand what you're going through - watching teachers make impulse purchases on technology that won't make have much learning value. Those Ozobots were pretty fun, and very exciting. My guess is that these teachers will be attracted to the coolness of them, but when they realize that they can't really be integrated into lessons (except perhaps for programming teachers) in any meaningful way, they'll be collecting dust on a shelf. If you are in a position to influence the technology purchase, I say speak up. If you aren't, don't sweat it too much.

      Thanks for the clip about Watson! I didn't know much about Watson, so it was cool to learn a little about it. People have been talking about artificial intelligence for decades! I'm interested to see what Watson and other forms of AI will be able to do for us. I find it interesting that there are countries full of early adopters and pioneers in modern tech and gadgetry, where tech is embedded into everyday processes (like ordering a Happy Meal). However, we in the US are not always on the cutting edge. We resist change and we fail to see the value in innovative solutions to common problems. Sure, we can perform flawless triple bypass surgeries and we can map every syllable of the human genome, but I'm hoping to see that more tech innovations become part of everyday life like they have in other countries. I'd like to see the improvements in banking and payment systems I mentioned above. I'd like to see people stop legislating against companies like Uber and Lyft that have shaken up the economic landscape, and reshaped the meaning of work in the sharing economy. I like when tech works for all, and not just those in the tower. I found a quote by science fiction writer William Gibson that I love: "The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed."

      Delete

Post a Comment